"Absolutely Beautiful" - or- A conversation with Siloca Sneek
- Kris Collins:
- my current favorite secular song is Unwell, by Matchbox 20
- nontalk:
- I hate you
- Kris Collins:
- WHAT!?
- nontalk:
- because I HATE matchbox 20 with a deep and unforgiving hatred
- Kris Collins:
- no way
- nontalk:
- they are one of the most annoying bands I have ever heard
- Kris Collins:
- fish
- nontalk:
- yes they ARE fish
- Kris Collins:
- lol
- nontalk:
- honestly, and I am not exaggerating, I really despise them
- Kris Collins:
- there's a reason they're so popular, and in this case it's because they are bigtime
- nontalk:
- many many people like them, to be sure, I am not one of those
- Kris Collins:
- do you think it's possible that you hate them precisely because they are so popular/
- nontalk:
- no, I am NOT in that camp at all
- Kris Collins:
- good
- nontalk:
- I actually hate people who hate music for it's being popular
- Kris Collins:
- maybe it's because you're UNWELL
- Kris Collins:
- me too
- nontalk:
- I hate the feeling I get when the sound of their music reaches my eardrums
- Kris Collins:
- LOL
- nontalk:
- that is why I hate them
- Kris Collins:
- that amazes me
- nontalk:
- honestly, I was just saying to jody (for probably the 100th time) how much I hate them
- Kris Collins:
- hey, i hate those people too - that "hate" something because it all of a sudden became popular
- Kris Collins:
- no way
- Kris Collins:
- you were?
- nontalk:
- yes I was
- nontalk:
- last week
- nontalk:
- here is a good way to describe those music fans/idiots....
- nontalk:
- Johnny: "oh I hate [band x] because they are so popular now, they sold out"
- nontalk:
- translation..........
- nontalk:
- Johnny: "I hate the fact that I no longer have some claim of superiority due to my secret knowledge of some 'underground' band. I never actually liked their music, what I like was the fact that I knew them before most of the lemmings who like them now."
- Kris Collins:
- exactly
- nontalk:
- Actually the real truth is....
- nontalk:
- these people LOVE it when 'their' underground bands sell out, because then they actually have the opportunity to tell everyone how they used to love them before they sold out
- Kris Collins:
- YES
- nontalk:
- they HATE (or at least don't enjoy) the actual music....that is an irrelevant aspect of the whole thing...... they LOVE feeling cool
- Kris Collins:
- nice, groove
- Kris Collins:
- btb analysis
- nontalk:
- and I love hating these people
- Kris Collins:
- i honestly can't imagine, however, someone not loving matchbox 20
- Kris Collins:
- but alas, we are all different
- nontalk:
- I can't imagine how someone could say what you just did
- nontalk:
- we are different. I am willing to admit that I can conceive how someone would like their music.....
- nontalk:
- it is like this..... I don't like Bailey's Irish Cream. for some reason I feel like I want to puke everytime I take a sip.. but my wife LOVES it
- Kris Collins:
- LOL
- nontalk:
- I don't know why I don't llike it
- Kris Collins:
- i suppose, i receive that
- Kris Collins:
- however, what i mean is
- Kris Collins:
- i know and believe that not all people like it...
- nontalk:
- yes
- Kris Collins:
- but since i do love it , yet don't know why, and therefore deduce that it is the music that is loveable, not me objectively loving the music...
- nontalk:
- aha!
- Kris Collins:
- it's difficult to imagine WHY someone wouldn't like it
- nontalk:
- here is the thing.....
- Kris Collins:
- ALL TRUTH MUST BE RELATIVE
- Kris Collins:
- ;)
- nontalk:
- I think that aesthetics are PURELY relative
- nontalk:
- I don't think there is any objective beauty
- Kris Collins:
- wow, that's something
- Kris Collins:
- hmm....
- Kris Collins:
- very interesting
- nontalk:
- I really , truley believe that
- Kris Collins:
- how about truth... is absolute truth objectively beautiful?
- Kris Collins:
- or is it just true
- Kris Collins:
- merely true
- nontalk:
- it is beautiful to some.
- nontalk:
- not to others
- Kris Collins:
- so you're saying... truth IS beautiful, yet some see it as such and some simply do not
- nontalk:
- NOPE I don't mean that........
- Kris Collins:
- or did i say that?
- Kris Collins:
- suhoo....
- nontalk:
- I don't think you can say "x = beautiful" because I think that beauty is experienced at given moments in time
- nontalk:
- it isn't an attribute
- nontalk:
- now, in english I would say, my wife is beautiful
- nontalk:
- but what I mean by that is.... I experience beauty via her
- Kris Collins:
- sheesh
- Kris Collins:
- good stuff
- Kris Collins:
- i agree with that... however, shouldn't we experience beauty in all absolute truth
- Kris Collins:
- if it is in fact true
- nontalk:
- I will say this....... everyone will always experience beauty when they clearly "see" God
- Kris Collins:
- that's what i was getting to
- nontalk:
- but that doesn't mean that God = beauty
- Kris Collins:
- no, but he IS beautiful
- nontalk:
- yeah that works
- nontalk:
- 6 of 1, half 12 of the other
- Kris Collins:
- you think so?
- Kris Collins:
- but it's not just an arbitrary assignment
- Kris Collins:
- he's beautiful for a reason (or many reasons), one of which is
- he is truth
- Kris Collins:
- or
- he is always true/right
- Kris Collins:
- so this subjective experience/emotion will necessarily follow when this truth is truely beheld
- nontalk:
- YES!
- nontalk:
- at least that is my hunch
- Kris Collins:
- hyeah
- nontalk:
- but about things that aren't absolute, I don't think we can assign "absolutely"
- the attribute "beautiful"
- Kris Collins:
- agreed
- Kris Collins:
- i would tend to say that it follows, then, that all ABSOLUTE TRUTH will be experienced as beautiful when clearly beheld...
- Kris Collins:
- however, could it be that there is truth that is DETESTIBLE?
- Kris Collins:
- by definition
- Kris Collins:
- so then, maybe God's TRUENESS in and of itself isn't necessarily beautiful
- Kris Collins:
- ooofta
- nontalk:
- I kind of don't know what to say about that. because some people might be genuinely repulsed by the fact that 2=2
- Kris Collins:
- lol
- Kris Collins:
- true
- Kris Collins:
- wow
- Kris Collins:
- well
- Kris Collins:
- i digress
- Kris Collins:
- thanks for the chitchat
- nontalk:
- good conversation though, this might make it onto nontalk.com
- Kris Collins:
- REALY?
- nontalk:
- well sure, it was a good one.
5 Comments:
There is no absolute truth. The bell always rings twice- the double-ring.
Groove, you don't believe in objective beauty eh? Interssssting. Or do you just not believe that human beings can recognize it? Is beauty truly out there for you but we just don't always see it, or is beauty reduced to taste and preference?
And dont' give me a trite answer, like "Let go and let Zod"
theYod, I think that beauty is experienced. It doesn't exist per se... You can't put it in a jar.
When we say something is beautiful, we are really trying to convey the experience we had with it. And each person may have a completely unique experience of beauty with the same object/idea/song.
For example, if you and theDan were both to look at my butt, well, you WOULD both experience beauty*, but you might each have your own unique experience. You might "find" beauty in the shape, theDan might "find" beauty in the texture.
*There are only a few things which I am willing to say that ALL people EVERYWHERE will experience beauty through: God, the movie Open Range, and my butt.
I googled u and look what came up:
Ballistic (1995)
Jesse Gavin is no ordinary policewoman; she knows how to handle herself in any situation. She's an undercover cop, part of an elite police team and highly skilled in lethal martial arts! After a government witness she was supposed to protect is killed, she is suspended from the force. The next day her partner is found dead. Has she been set up? With the help of the two men closest to her heart, her boyfriend and her father, she must battle to clear her name. The deeper she delves, the deadlier the game becomes. There is no denying, she's Ballistic!
subject and object: both a matter of interpretation: No, objective facts are precisely what there are not, only interpretations. We cannot establish any fact 'in itself'. .. 'Everything is subjective,' you say; but even this is an interpretation. The subject, human or otherwise, is not a given, it is a superadded invention, stuck on to the tail.
Truth and Error: no 'truth' at the origin, but 'truths' and 'errors' - neither description more accurate - cast up by the waves of control preserving interpretations: what are mans truths afterall but todays unrefuted errors which will tomorrow fall. THe history of truth is nothing more than the history of technology.
Good and evil: what an absurd idea. takes good and evil for realities that contradict each other - morality itself is a special case of immorality.
Freedom and Necessity, purpose and accident: 2000 years of christian history and a minneapolis fan following that would be better off taking an epistemology and metaphysics course that humbly read some Derrida, Freud and Nietzshe than going to church to get "learned" in absolute truth: once you know that there are no purposes, you also no there are no accidents, for it is only beside a world of purposes that the idea of accident has any meaning. 2000 years.... a mans quest for sovereingty of God... I think he just misses his mother.
~devries - look forward to hearing from you. rdevries8@yahoo.com
Post a Comment
<< Home